Angular 20

Angular Standalone vs Traditional Projects – Complete Comparison (Angular 20 Guide)

Understanding the Difference Between Angular Projects With and Without Standalone Components

Angular has evolved significantly, especially with Angular 14 to Angular 20, introducing a powerful feature — Standalone Components. This blog explains the difference between traditional (NgModule-based) Angular projects and the new Standalone approach in depth.

🔧 Installing Angular 20

Make sure you have Node.js (v18+) installed before you begin.

Install Angular CLI

npm install -g @angular/cli@20

Create a Traditional Angular Project


ng new myapp --no-standalone --routing --style=scss
cdmyapp
 ng serve

Create a Standalone Angular Project


ng new standalone-app --standalone --routing --style=scss
cd standalone-app
ng serve
The --standalone flag instructs Angular CLI to generate a standalone component-based project.

🏗 Traditional Angular (with NgModules)

📁 Folder Structure


traditional-app/
├── src/
│   ├── app/
│   │   ├── app.module.ts
│   │   ├── app.component.ts
│   │   ├── feature/
│   │   │   ├── feature.module.ts
│   │   │   ├── feature.component.ts

✅ Key Characteristics

  • Every component, directive, and pipe must be declared in a NgModule.
  • Modules are used to encapsulate functionality.
  • Lazy loading is achieved via loadChildren.

📌 Example Feature Module


@NgModule({
  declarations: [FeatureComponent],
  imports: [CommonModule],
  exports: [FeatureComponent]
})
export class FeatureModule {}

⚡ Angular with Standalone Components

📁 Folder Structure


standalone-app/
├── src/
│   ├── app/
│   │   ├── app.config.ts
│   │   ├── app.ts (standalone: true)
│   │   ├── feature/
│   │   │   ├── feature.component.ts (standalone: true)

✅ Key Characteristics

  • Does not require NgModules.
  • Each component declares its own dependencies.
  • Better encapsulation and simpler setup.

📌 Standalone Component Example


@Component({
  selector: 'app-feature',
  standalone: true,
  imports: [CommonModule],
  template: '<h2>Standalone Feature</h2>'
})
export class FeatureComponent {}

📌 Standalone Routing Example


export const routes: Routes = [
  {
    path: 'feature',
    loadComponent: () =>
      import('./feature/feature.component').then(m => m.FeatureComponent)
  }
];

🔍 Key Differences Between Traditional and Standalone Angular Projects

Feature Traditional (NgModules) Standalone Components
Setup Uses AppModule Uses app.config.ts
Component Declaration Inside @NgModule Using standalone: true
Lazy Loading loadChildren loadComponent
Bootstrapping bootstrapModule(AppModule) bootstrapApplication(AppComponent)
Learning Curve Moderate to steep Simpler and modern

✅ Pros and Cons

Traditional (NgModules)

  • Pros: Well-supported, mature, good for very large apps.
  • Cons: Verbose, high boilerplate, module management complexity.

Standalone Components

  • Pros: Less boilerplate, better for modern app design, simpler to prototype.
  • Cons: Newer pattern, some older libraries may not support it fully.

🚀 When Should You Use Each?

Use Standalone Components If:

  • You are starting a new Angular 15+ project.
  • You prefer simplicity and a component-first approach.
  • You want to reduce boilerplate and accelerate development.

Use Traditional Modules If:

  • You are maintaining or upgrading an existing Angular app.
  • You need structured module separation.
  • Your app is large-scale and already uses shared modules extensively.

🧠 Conclusion

Angular Standalone Components provide a powerful alternative to traditional NgModule architecture, especially for new projects. While traditional modules offer structure, standalone components simplify development and align with modern web practices.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *