Understanding the Difference Between Angular Projects With and Without Standalone Components
Angular has evolved significantly, especially with Angular 14 to Angular 20, introducing a powerful feature — Standalone Components. This blog explains the difference between traditional (NgModule-based) Angular projects and the new Standalone approach in depth.
🔧 Installing Angular 20
Make sure you have Node.js (v18+) installed before you begin.
Install Angular CLI
npm install -g @angular/cli@20
Create a Traditional Angular Project
ng new myapp --no-standalone --routing --style=scss cd
myapp
ng serve
Create a Standalone Angular Project
ng new standalone-app --standalone --routing --style=scss
cd standalone-app
ng serve
The
--standalone
flag instructs Angular CLI to generate a standalone component-based project.🏗 Traditional Angular (with NgModules)
📁 Folder Structure
traditional-app/
├── src/
│ ├── app/
│ │ ├── app.module.ts
│ │ ├── app.component.ts
│ │ ├── feature/
│ │ │ ├── feature.module.ts
│ │ │ ├── feature.component.ts
✅ Key Characteristics
- Every component, directive, and pipe must be declared in a NgModule.
- Modules are used to encapsulate functionality.
- Lazy loading is achieved via
loadChildren
.
📌 Example Feature Module
@NgModule({
declarations: [FeatureComponent],
imports: [CommonModule],
exports: [FeatureComponent]
})
export class FeatureModule {}
⚡ Angular with Standalone Components
📁 Folder Structure
standalone-app/
├── src/
│ ├── app/
│ │ ├── app.config.ts
│ │ ├── app.ts (standalone: true)
│ │ ├── feature/
│ │ │ ├── feature.component.ts (standalone: true)
✅ Key Characteristics
- Does not require NgModules.
- Each component declares its own dependencies.
- Better encapsulation and simpler setup.
📌 Standalone Component Example
@Component({
selector: 'app-feature',
standalone: true,
imports: [CommonModule],
template: '<h2>Standalone Feature</h2>'
})
export class FeatureComponent {}
📌 Standalone Routing Example
export const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'feature',
loadComponent: () =>
import('./feature/feature.component').then(m => m.FeatureComponent)
}
];
🔍 Key Differences Between Traditional and Standalone Angular Projects
Feature | Traditional (NgModules) | Standalone Components |
---|---|---|
Setup | Uses AppModule |
Uses app.config.ts |
Component Declaration | Inside @NgModule |
Using standalone: true |
Lazy Loading | loadChildren |
loadComponent |
Bootstrapping | bootstrapModule(AppModule) |
bootstrapApplication(AppComponent) |
Learning Curve | Moderate to steep | Simpler and modern |
✅ Pros and Cons
Traditional (NgModules)
- Pros: Well-supported, mature, good for very large apps.
- Cons: Verbose, high boilerplate, module management complexity.
Standalone Components
- Pros: Less boilerplate, better for modern app design, simpler to prototype.
- Cons: Newer pattern, some older libraries may not support it fully.
🚀 When Should You Use Each?
Use Standalone Components If:
- You are starting a new Angular 15+ project.
- You prefer simplicity and a component-first approach.
- You want to reduce boilerplate and accelerate development.
Use Traditional Modules If:
- You are maintaining or upgrading an existing Angular app.
- You need structured module separation.
- Your app is large-scale and already uses shared modules extensively.
🧠 Conclusion
Angular Standalone Components provide a powerful alternative to traditional NgModule architecture, especially for new projects. While traditional modules offer structure, standalone components simplify development and align with modern web practices.